Castrating Paedophiles

2009 September 28
by steph

In Europe and the USA there is growing support for surgical castration and chemical castration of paedophiles. At the moment castration is voluntarily but in California, Scandinavia and France it is officially being used as an incentive to early release from prison. And is now going to have a bearing on probation boards decisions to release offenders in Britain too.

Surgical Castration dramatically reduces a man’s sexual drive and in most can stop a man from getting an erection, there is very little evidence to show how effective this is but what there is shows a low rate of sexual recidivism. Removing the ovaries of female paedophiles is shown to have the similar effects to surgical castration.

Chemical castration may be more effective at reducing the man’s capacity to get an erection and again what tests have been conducted show a low rate of sexual recidivism but there can be serious health side effects and the treatment can cause death.

The problem with chemical castration is that it is not very precise and not only the side effects it might be abused by the paedophile who can lie about the effects of his medication. Also because these people are not cured they would have to take the medication for the rest of their lives.

Surgical castration might not work because although it is a single irreversible procedure, testosterone injections would reverse the effect. Testosterone is regularly used by bodybuilders and athletes.

Other problems with castration are that it would make it harder for a paedophile to be traced as there would be less chance of DNA evidence being found.

But my main concern is why are paedophiles being released back into the community at all. It would be far more sensible to lock them up for life – then you know they not going to re-offend. The fact that so many paedophiles want to be castrated bothers me too. I don’t except that this is a disease that they have no control over, they weren’t born this way, this is such a cop out. It like saying – “it wasn’t me it was my balls”!

In you rape a child under 13 you should get an automatic life sentence, without the possibility of parole.

36 Responses leave one →
  1. 2009 November 5

    stacy your beautiful and so right about castration to all those freak,s it,s out of control in the usa~~~

  2. 2009 October 24

    @Alfie

    Feel free to respond to the nonce if you want, but we’re just going to kill off the illiterate pederast gobshite’s comments.

    btw, SK is Dave (same IP address). Dissociative identity disorder is in the DSM IV too. Personally, I think psychiatry is the modern version of a pikey telling your fortune by reading tea leafs; 9mm therapy works every time.

  3. 2009 October 24

    Be sure to leave a link or other note of the article the well respected paper writes will ya ?
    Dave said…

    I hope that my input is enlightening.

    Not really you seem to just be stirring the pot. Society has an innate desire to protect children…boo hoo for those that feel this somehow infringes on them.
    The constant harangue of Pedophile doesn’t = child rapists is false. raped child = pedophile is the truth.
    So to the pedos that resist their urges or even seek help for these oh so unnatural feelings good for you. Continue your struggle and you’ll never be bothered by the law or angry masses.
    In closing….as long as Steph allows I will not tire of assuring the truth be told.

  4. 2009 October 23

    @ Alfie

    Steven Kutis is a teacher in a public school in New York state.

  5. 2009 October 23

    On a side note dyslexia is in the DSM IV too. Happy reading if you pick up your copy anytime soon.

  6. 2009 October 23

    You evasive little git. I am amazed by how you dance around. Now you’re not an active pedophile. What the hell does that even mean ? You’ve gone from a victim of something beyond your control to now someone who can choose a behavior as easily as one chooses a sweater ?
    Also if you really care for the answer to your previous show me show me stuff. I don’t know if it is just an American publication. Over here there is a book called the DSM IV. It is used to categorize psychiatric disorders. Pedophilia is a disorder one will find under the parasexual disorders. It is a medical disorder until one acts on it. then it is a crime.
    You’ve earned with a bonus all the crap you took in this thread. You were dishonest,arrogant and ignorant from the word go. Fare ye well sk fare ye well

  7. 2009 October 23

    @ Alfie

    Exactly!!!

  8. 2009 October 23

    @ SK

    It’s not perverse to want to kill a child rapist – what’s perverse is for an adult to fantasise about raping prepubescents!

  9. 2009 October 23

    @ SK

    This is a typical reaction and your comment is typical of a pedophobe. No thought process, no rational analysis of what i said,

    No, it is a very rational: you couldn’t be convicted of having twisted sexual fantasies of raping or sexually molesting prepubescents because as long as you didn’t tell anyone, none of us would be any the wiser, and so long as they remained fantasies you would be doing no one else any harm. It is only when you actualise those fantasies that you commit a crime, and as such become an active paedophile. Convicted paedophiles (i.e. anyone convicted of sex crimes against prepubescents) should never be allowed out of jail but castration might be of some benefit to you.

  10. 2009 October 22

    Dear Alfie,
    Please dont be so delirious. You’ve proven it already!
    You are truly a repulsive person but maybe i should react to the tiny slither in your message that some people might give credit to.
    When you tell me what this thread was about, i could swear it said “Castrating Paedophiles”, my mistake, it obviously was meant to read “Castrating child abusers”.
    I had every fucking right (pardon me) for objecting to this thread and now i believe i have explained it fully even for the more intellectually challenged here. My job is done on this thread and i didnt intend on hijacking it, but really, i cannot allow you people to discuss me in this way behind my back.
    I hope my comments remain FOR THE GOOD OF HUMANITY!
    (p.s. I wasn’t trying to be a “word twisting intellectual”, but thanks for the compliment)

  11. 2009 October 22

    SK you either dream of fucking little kids or actively plan on it. Or perhaps your in true control and dream off little girls and boys whilst banging some hag.
    The post wasn’t about starry eyed pedophiles who struggle with any demon or are super comfy with the wiring and /or lifestyle choices they have. It was about pedophiles who have acted upon their urges and committed a crime.
    You ponce you try to be some word twisting intellectual but you are nothing of the kind.
    Do you need/desire societies acceptance of you. Poof I waved my magic wand and it is so. Now whence you con a little boy into your bed and plug up his ass is society to accept that too ?
    The original post was all about the punishment that should be levied upon a person that commits a crime. Are you seriously suggesting it isn’t a crime to have sex with a minor ?
    You say I lose. How pathetic you are.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS