Police Brutality

2009 June 17

Two Nottinghamshire Police officers arrested a 40-year-old man coming out of a nightclub. They alleged that he assaulted a police officer and tried to resist arrest but none of that is shown on the video. Instead, what we see are two coppers standing over a downed man and one using a Taser to administer a 50,000-volt shock on to him, then kick the man while the other cop tries to force his hand behind his back. Two more coppers grab the man’s legs, the man is subdued and not resisting, but the cop again unnecessarily Tasers the man. Then one of the other coppers punches him repeatedly in the head.

If there was a need for further evidence that the police shouldn’t be armed with tasers this is it. But this is entirely predictable. Taser are an ineffective and unpredictable weapon. It’s impossible to know what will happen when you Taser someone but if all goes well and they don’t die from the initial shock, they should recover in seconds. So if they were a threat before they’re a still a threat afterwards, and you can bet that is what those coppers will be arguing during the investigation. What that incident shows is that police don’t use Taser for self-defence they use it as an instrument of torture. It also shows that Taser are utterly useless for forcing compliance.

31 Responses leave one →
  1. 2009 November 7

    @ Scott

    Thanks :) I would be mortally offended if I was.

  2. 2009 November 5
    scott permalink

    and by “ever had reason” I, of course, mean “never had reason”

  3. 2009 November 5
    scott permalink

    By the way, you are very sharp. But I am sure that you have ever had reason to complain that men only like you for your mind. (to paraphrase Morrissey) ;)

  4. 2009 November 5
    scott permalink

    In the States, and I am sure it is the same across the pond since our law decends from yours, not all batteries are criminal. If I negligently injure someone then it is a battery, but not necessarily criminal. In such a case criminal prosecution would be inappropriate, hence monetary damages in a civil suit.

    To be sure, I agree fully with you that if an officer’s use of his taser is deemed unlawful or to be more specific, criminal, he should be taken to task accordingly. But I don’t think that the wrongful use of a taser is always criminal (i.e. there is not criminal intent). For example, an officer can negligently evaluate the risk of a situation and deploy his taser. Such a situation would be negligent not criminal.

  5. 2009 November 5

    @ scott

    None taken.

  6. 2009 November 4
    scott permalink

    My comment was tongue in cheek. No offense intende.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS