Miss California: No Gay Marriages
Carrie Prejean
The current Miss California and Miss USA runner-up Carrie Prejean, was asked by one of the judges Perez Hilton at the Miss USA beauty pageant for her views on legalising gay marriage.
She just told him the truth: she thinks it’s wrong!
She said, “I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody there.”
Good for her!
If Perez Hilton don’t like her answer, he shouldn’t have freaking asked. It ain’t like it was a gay pageant. But now he and the gay mafia are hating on her because she won’t pretend that she thinks two perverts getting married is the same as a man and woman getting married!
No offence to these homo-humpers but a guy sticking his dick or tongue up another guy’s arse ‘ole ain’t normal and they wasn’t born that way. They choose to be perverts, just like some sick freaks choose to be peados, trannies or goat molesters.
steph
amica
rob
http://alvarezgalloso.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/carrie-prejean-fired-from-miss-california/
Another article that condemns bigotry against Carrie Prejean
@ mmk
I’ve explained my views on the state in the posts on anarchism but that’s not what this post is about, I’ve also explained my beliefs on the state and marriage in an earlier post.
@ Steph,
I am curious. As you are an anarchist (your bio states) do you believe the state should even have the power recognise or unrecognise anything?
If you believe that State has the power to recognise… what do you think is reasonable for them to recognise? Right to life? Human Rights? Again, I am asking out of curiosity.
And I am aware of Rob’s tactic to point out the absurdity of their logic and I was just extending on the absurdity by having fun with it.
Which is a good thing
@ Rob
You sound like Amie – “I don’t have a problem with you being a disgusting pervert…” lol.
Then don’t sniff it.
@ mmk
It’s a clever reductio ad absurdum, if men can marry men, women can marry women, and chickens can marry chickens: why not man and chicken, or a man and KFC bargain bucket? The same logic of free choice applies but my argument is why should the state recognise any marriage? I don’t believe in state recognition of any marriages .
@ Mehdi
What, so I should be a Lez to make some perverts feel better about being disgusting degenerates? Nah, don’t think so. And what’s wrong with calling gays, homo-humpers or perverts, it’s what they are.
@ Rob
Don’t think people should be allowed to marry animals either but it’s no freaking worse than two men getting married.
@ Roberto
Thanks, I agree with you too, these fascist are the intolerant ones. We don’t stop them from being perverts, they want to do it, it’s up to them but we don’t have to pretend it’s right or accept gay marriage.
@amie: I agree with you. Marriage should be between a man and a woman.