Police Agent Provocateur

2008 June 30

Courtesy of Spidered News

To Rt Hon Jacqui Smith
Home Secretary

Urgent

Dear Home Secretary,

As you may be aware I wrote to Sir Ian Blair and Mayor Johnson calling for an inquiry into the policing of the demonstration against George W Bush on Sunday 15 June in Parliament Square/Whitehall. I enclose a copy of my letter to him. I should say I have since been visited by Superintendent Tim Jackson and have given him an account of the basis of my original complaint.

I did tell him, however, that subsequent newspaper revelations may indicate a far more sinister involvement of the police in actual law-breaking on the demonstration which sought to provoke exactly the ugly scenes which eventually ensued.

Since my meeting with the superintendent yesterday this issue has become clearer and obliges me both as a Member of Parliament and as a close witness to these events to write to you as Home Secretary demanding a full inquiry by the government into the extraordinary events and policy decisions surrounding the policing of this demonstration.

You will be aware by now of an article in the Mail on Sunday of 22 June by Yasmin Whittaker-Khan in which she recounts her shock at meeting a man, whom she knew to be a policeman from a previous encounter, who seemed determined to bring about a confrontation between the demonstrators and the police.

This man for at least 30 minutes was stood right next to me at the front of the protest and it is inconceivable that no police photograph will confirm this. I say this because several police stills cameramen and at least one video cameraman were constantly filming.

Rapped ... Insp Chris DreyfusI can now confirm that this man was Chris Dreyfus, an inspector in the police.

This man, to my direct knowledge, committed four criminal offences during the 30 minutes or so he stood next to me. First, he repeatedly chanted the arcane, antiquated Americana, “Kill the pigs!” This is a clear incitement to violence, indeed murder. If a Muslim demonstrator had been chanting it, say, outside the Danish Embassy, he would likely now be in prison. Secondly, he repeatedly (crushing me in the process) attempted to charge the crush barriers and the police line behind them. Thirdly, he repeatedly exhorted others so to do. Fourthly, he instructed a young demonstrator on the correct way to uncouple a crush barrier, which was successfully achieved and was subsequently thrown at the police, and was presumably one of the justifications for the deployment of a riot squad which eventually waded in to the protesters.

Home Secretary, there can hardly a more grave indictment of the conduct of the police force in a democratic country than this. People in the labour movement have often mythologised the state’s use of agents provocateurs throughout my 40 years experience and no doubt long before. But, to my recollection, we have never caught one red-handed before.

This inspector’s criminal actions must place all the other in themselves legitimate complaints about police tactics in a new light. I wrote to Sir Ian – and to Mayor Johnson – questioning the competence of the policing on that day. It now seems that what happened was a deliberate conspiracy to bring about scenes of violent disorder, seen around the world and for purposes on which we can only speculate.

You, however, have clear responsibility to get to the heart of this matter. I do hope you will begin to do so without delay. In any case,

Yours sincerely,

George Galloway MP

31 Responses
  1. 2008 July 11

    @ lwtc

    I think there are three possible explanations for why the Bush administration subverted the criminal investigation:

    1) they were complicit.
    2) they wanted to protect whoever was complicit.
    3) they fabricated the evidence of al-Qaeda involvement as a pretext for war.

  2. 2008 July 11

    “I don’t know what happened on 911 and neither does anyone else” Some do – the ones who did it, and I’d have to say from what you say above and from other parts of 9-11 the role of Bush et al looks highly suspicious. Until I see evidence that poinsts elsewhere I am happy with my belief he scumbag did it or the scumbags ‘brain’ (Cheney), or at the very least they let it happen on purpose.
    It’s proved as you say that they hindered investigations to establish the truth, and there are penal laws against that kind of thing.

  3. 2008 July 10

    @ lwtc

    I’m not sure what he means mythologised – perhaps he means it hasn’t been proven before? – but it has defintely been proved outside the UK.

    I agree about Galloway and conspiracy theories, he uses that term too readily to dismiss provable conspiracies. The US federal government conspired to subvert and prevent a criminal investigation into the events of 911, the biggest mass murder on American soil. They have conspired to prevent material witnesses in that crime from setting foot in any American jurisdiction. They have helped other material witnesses, including five Israelis arrested at the scene, to leave America. And they have never presented concrete evidence that al-Qaeda or Bin laden was involved in 911, which was the pretext for the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan.

    I don’t know what happened on 911 and neither does anyone else but I do know the Bush regime hasn’t been been open and transparent about it.

  4. 2008 July 9

    I feel happy the police swine have been caught in the act, but angry when GG describes as “mythologised”, past events of police acting as agents provocateurs.

    No, actually I’m not angry – I’m more than angry, because people like GG for all his pro’s, have casued much frustration to peoples like myself who are deeply concerned by actions of the state, is is people like me (and others who have posted here and linked here) have been trying to make people aware of just what the hell is actually happening and where we are headed; GG like many others call us not jobs and potty conspiracy theorists. Sorry George but while I pat you on the back with one hand, I’m giving you a temporary thumbs down with the other.

    That the police just the other day decided to conduct their first act of an agent provocateur is deeply offensive.

    As my good web buddy antireptilian does well to ppint out, the Canadian police were caught too. Looking at that case, it is even more obvious what will happen here… A big fat nothing.

    No wait, that’s not right, something will happen. The slimy police force will draught in officers from rural areas instead to minimise identification.

    Some may say that it is telling that by resorting to such deplorable methods they are scared of protests. Sadly this is NOT the case. They probably love to see people stand in the street achieving nothing and feeling satisfied that they’ve ‘exercised democracy’ only to sleeping well in their beds later.

    They do this to discourage people taking the first step of action (peaceful protest) which then leads onto the initial condition which they fear – acts of civil disobedience {coupled with financial activity} which comes about when people realise the march/demo has been a flop.

    The country needs someone to organise civil disobedience en masse as we need to bypass the protest march (name one that’s succeeded in the last 20 years). Until this happens, expect things to get a lot lot worse.

  5. 2008 July 7

    @ Paul

    I agree.

  6. 2008 July 7
    paul mayuw permalink

    everyone must start asking police for ID whenever they see them, and if they are stopping and asking for ID make sure you ask them for their ID before they do, ask for papers.

    PAPERS PAPERS!!

  7. 2008 July 5

    “So why is your constituency so anti police?”

    Who is going to like them?

  8. 2008 July 2

    It’s not just Bethnal Green and Bow, the whole of the East End is anti police and always has been, ever since the ever since the Bow Street Runners. It’s always been home to working class and immigrant communities and been considered as a hot bed of radicalism and lawlessness. Marx and Malatesta both stayed here at one point. It’s a communist and anarchist heartland (it’s Stephi land :D ). It’s seen off fascist from Moseley to Churchill, and the police has always been a force of social political and economic oppression, from the early 1700s, when Charles Hitchen and Jonathan Wild were appointed “thief catchers”, to Blair and Forrest Gate.

    In the Battle of Cabal Street, the police who stood with the blackshirts were routed by anti fascists. My Great Grandfather and Grandfather fought in that battle. The East End hates the police because the police deserve to be hated.

    Commander Dr Ali Dizaei recognises the problem he suggested that instead of reporting crimes to the police the Muslim community could go through an impartial ombudsman, so they don’t have to have any contact with the police.

  9. 2008 July 2
    heather permalink

    Steph…

    see, over here he’d be considered very left wing and anti police. So why is your constituency so anti police?

  10. 2008 July 2
    heather permalink

    BZ…

    “I’m semi-ashamed to admit I had to scroogle that phrase”

    me too. :)

  11. 2008 July 2

    “unless she signs a PII preventing disclosure that she signed the previous PII” – sadly I reckon this will be the outcome.

    Just reading Butler Shaffer’s ‘The Wizards of Ozymandias’ (beats working) – this chapter in particular resonating with the peculiar affair of Inspector Dreyfus

    http://tinyurl.com/4b9ebh

  12. 2008 July 2

    antireptilian

    Gandhi is a good example, it wasn’t passive resistance that forced the British government to handover India and it wasn’t resistance that forced the partition of British colonial India. Passive resistance has its place but so does violent resistance.

  13. 2008 July 2

    @ Bz

    I thought Juvenal’s question fitted rather well :)

    Dreyfus will have to be investigated unless the Home Secretary signs a PII, but id she does we should know about that unless she signs a PII preventing disclosure that she signed the previous PII. Don’t you just love our free and open society.

  14. 2008 July 1

    I’m semi-ashamed to admit I had to scroogle that phrase.

    We do have the IPCC. I’m sure they’ve already had Inspector Dreyfus in for preliminary interview ahead of the full public investigation.

    Of course they’ve also taken full statements from the protestors assaulted in the aftermath of Dreyfus’ provocation and will take these into account.

    I just noticed that there’s another IPCC around, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. They’d probably do a better job of any inquiry than the Impotent Porky Cover-up Crew.

  15. 2008 July 1

    @ BZ

    Exactly. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  16. 2008 July 1

    @ heather

    George supports Hezbollah’s right to resist and he’s quite left wing, but he’s defintely not anti police. He’s been criticised for being to pro police. He supported them in their pay dispute with the government, when most trade unionists consider them the enemy.

  17. 2008 July 1

    @ antireptilian

    The poll tax riots and race riots achieved far more than peaceful protests. Football hooliganism has always worked. A 100,000 rioters couldn’t be ignored in the same way that over 1.5 million protestors could be. If the next anti war protest was a riot – it would be the government’s fault.

  18. 2008 July 1

    It’s on such occasions that we’re shown the true nature of the police; the state’s enforcers as opposed to most people’s delusional vision of ’society’s guardians’.

  19. 2008 July 1
    antireptilian permalink

    Steph
    To an extent yes, but even limited protests serve a purpose. They increase awareness. Without any protest at all, the scum can move without any resistance at all, and the public will never find out what a voice is for.

    What was the quote, you cannot fly into flying, you must learn to walk first.

    Anyhow, riots in this new police state, will be met with serious countermeasures. Remember Ghandi? It is easier for the cops to crush rioters than peaceful protest.

  20. 2008 July 1

    I so hope Dreyfus gets nicked. :)

  21. 2008 June 30
    heather permalink

    Your MP is pro Hezbollah and anti police? :)

    See, we don’t have any senators like that.

  22. 2008 June 30

    I disagree peaceful protests aren’t achieving anything. In the UK, in recent history riot’s have been a lot more successful.

  23. 2008 June 30
    antireptilian permalink

    Steph

    We cannot allow this activity to limit our movements and gatherings. As long as those that protest understand and abide by peaceful action, they will expose themselves as they already are.

  24. 2008 June 30

    Antireptilian

    Either he’s a fascist pig or he’s seen the light. :)

  25. 2008 June 30

    heather

    Definitely he can (and should) be charged. If convicted of incitement to commit murder and rioting he could face a maximum life sentence. There is clearly a public interest in his prosecution. I’d have defintely thought Bush would have been aware. The British government would need to known whether a manufacturing police baton charge at an anti-Bush protest would have been politically embarrassing for the GOP — obviously not – they probably sent over the Rodney King tapes as training videos.

  26. 2008 June 30

    Antireptilian

    This is SOP in Europe and probably in North America too, it’s one of the reasons to avoid these type of mass street demonstrations.

  27. 2008 June 30

    My constituency MP is hard to ignore.

    Interview on SKY News

    Wiping Norm Coleman off the map

  28. 2008 June 30

    Go, George!

    It’d be nice if someone were listening…

  29. 2008 June 30
    antireptilian permalink

    Yet another case of this sort of thing. How stupid do they think we are? All i can say is, anyone attending protest actions must beware of AP’s.

    The SPP summit in Canada was another case where the “anarchists” that were arrested were found to be wearing the same boots as the cops…After initial denials, they had to admit their activities, as did the local council.

    The real question here is, what is the mindset of the morons like Chris Dreyfus, who go along with this in the face of democracy, liberty and the special position police hold in respect to preserving the peace.

    The reason for formenting violence and the subsequent police reaction? To limit protest and free speech.

  30. 2008 June 30
    heather permalink

    Can he be arrested?

  31. 2008 June 30
    heather permalink

    Wow, Steph the police in London are out of control. Probably happens in New York too. I wonder if Bush had anything to do with it?

Comments are closed for this entry.