Jewish Terrorism
Nazism wasn’t defeated in 1945: it triumphed. Sixty years ago, on the 14 May 1948, European Jews, with the support of the British and American governments, colonised Palestine and established a “Jewish State”, through a campaign of genocide, ethnic-cleansing and terrorism that continues to this day. The majority of the indigenous Palestinian population – the rightful inhabitants of that land – have been displaced or killed by the Jewish occupying regime, and those that remain within Palestine are denied equal civil or political rights.
Zionism has always been about naked imperial aggression: when Britain invaded and occupied Jerusalem in December 1917, Foreign Secretary Balfour had already given a written commitment to Baron Rothschild that the British government would support the creation of Jewish homeland in Palestinian territory, or as Balfour put it in 1919 – Zionism was “of far profounder importance than the desire and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land.” Despite the fact that Jews had no more legal or moral right to a homeland in Palestine than the Nazis had to a fatherland in Poland, the British government was fully committed to the Jewish annexing of Palestine, and when Britain gave itself a mandate to rule Palestine as colonial overlord during the San Remo conference, ensuring that Palestine’s boundaries would “be determined by the Principal Allied Powers.” In September 1944, the British established the Jewish Brigade Group, ostensibly to fight against the Nazis, but they were allowed to enter Palestine and join the Haganah terrorist movement.
A fact lost on most Israeli-sympathisers is that Zionism is the Jewish equivalent of Nazism. The vast majority of Zionist settlers weren’t refugees, they didn’t flee Nazi occupied Europe, and they weren’t holocaust victims: they were religious extremists, fascists, criminals and terrorists. Most Israeli prime ministers were terrorists during the British mandate, including the Jewish Hitler: Ben Gurion. Another fact ignored by Israeli sympathisers, is the sheer scale of Jewish terrorism, both against the Palestinians and the British, despite British forces having waged a genocidal war against the Ottoman empire an occupied Palestine on their behalf.
The Zionist used a combination of terrorism, bribery and propaganda to extort governments into supporting the Jewish conquest of Palestine; there was never any sympathy for it amongst the British public, especially not after the kidnapping, torture, hanging and desecration of sergeants Clifford Martin and Mervyn Paice in 1947 by Jewish terrorists, but it was a top secret internal warning by early in 1946 that had the most impact on the British government:
“Members of the Stern group are now being organised and are under training. It is expected that they will be sent to the United Kingdom to assassinate important members of his majesty’s government, particularly, Mr Bevin.”
Jewish terrorist carried out several bombings in London and attempted to drop on a bomb on the House of Commons from a hired plane, which was foiled by the French Police. They also carried out several high profile assassinations on British public servants, with the support of the American Zionist lobby and media moguls.
Ever since Jewish terrorists colonised Palestine some sixty-years ago, Israel has been a by-word for genocide, ethnic-cleansing, imperialism and inhumannity. If ever there was a State sponsor of terrorism: it’s Israel.
@ George
No, genocide means:
And the Nazis never intended to kill every Jew they could get their hands on, in fact more German Jews served in the military under Hitler than were sent to the concentration camps, but the Nazi were still guilty of genocide, as are the Israelis. So if the Israelis are incompetent génocidaires, the Nazis were also.
I thought that the word “genocide” implied not just a brutal occupation, but an intent to wipe out the targeted population completely (as the Nazis killed every Jew they could get their hands on, for example).
If the Israelis are génocidaires, then they must be highly incompetent ones…
@ George
They called them Asiatics.
@ George
Genocide has a precise legal meaning – it’s a genocide – the numbers that have died over the last sixty-years as a result of it aren’t to be taken lightly. Zionism is a moral equivalent to Nazism and was as much part of the holocaust as Nazism.
Another thing, didn’t some Zionists regard the Mizrahim (indigenous Middle Eastern Jews) with contempt? Perhaps it was a weaker version – “cowardly religious mendicants, who don’t mind being dhimmis” – of the contempt they had for Holocaust survivors.
“We do not want Israelis to become Arabs. We are bound by duty to fight against the spirit of the Levant that corrupts individuals and society.” – David Ben Gurion
“One of the great apprehensions which afflict us is the danger of the predominance of immigrants of Oriental origin forcing Israel to equalize its cultural level with that of the neighboring world.” – Abba Eban
“You know that we have no common language with them. Our cultural level does not fit with their level; their lifestyle is the lifestyle of the middle ages.” – MK Shoshana Frasitz
“A Jew from Eastern Europe is worth twice as much as a Jew from Kurdistan” – Nachum Goldman, WZO President
Must you use the word “genocide” so lightly?
The population of Poland plummeted under the (truly genocidal) Nazi occupation, while the Palestinian population is rising – such that the Zionists fear that the Palestinians will out-breed them!
If the Nazis had occupied Poland for as long as the Israelis have occupied Palestine, wouldn’t the Poles now be an extinct race?
The difference is clear, even if you believe that it’s because Israel (unlike Nazi Germany in its time) is not an independent Great Power capable of saying to hell with world opinion, rather than because Zionism is morally better than Nazism.
(Anyway, I thought that Kahanism was Jewish Nazism, not Zionism as a whole…)
Iwtc247, The last reports were about his suspension.So,yes you are right.The reports about quash weren’t reported widely.Did you know that there were three judges at the hearing decided to suspend someone who was elected by thousands.
crown.
No. He wasn’t if you read up on it (sorry, the link I gave and even one on the “standardsboard”’s site isn’t working today… Aaah, you can find it under a slightly different file location. Hummm.)
You are here:
Standards Board for England : Case Information
The following case summaries match your search criteria. The most recent cases are displayed first.
SBE case number: SBE10001.05
Completed: 24 Feb 2006
Member: Mr Ken Livingstone
Authority: Greater London Authority
Allegation: A member brought his office or authority into disrepute.
SBE Outcome: The Ethical Standards Officer referred the matter to the Adjudication Panel for England for determination by a tribunal.
They changed the name of the page. Try this URL
Quote: Mr Livingstone appealed to the High Court against the case tribunal’s decision. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the finding that Mr Livingstone had failed to comply with the Code of Conduct, and quashed the suspension.
May I ask you why you thought he was suspended? Perhaps the MSM never bothered telling people his ’suspension’ was quashed.
All that expense, all that rubbish for nothing.
Well maybe for nothing… at least the Holocust once again was pushed into peoples minds again. Not that we should ever forget the hideous murder of many jews, but the unfounded points and bare faced lies about it shouldn’t be allowed into entertained by our consciousness other than in rejection.
@Iwtc, The outcome wasthat Ken was removed from his office for I think 28 days.I could be wrong on figures.
Honesty must prevail
I finally found info about Ken’s convenient jibe Located on this site http://www.standardsboard.gov.uk/ Full ‘n clickable link HERE
Cheers for that crown.
Let me put on record the strange coincidence that Ken made a somewhat tangential remark, and the journalist just happened to be Jewish. Well fancy that.
“I work very closely with Ken so I can speak of what he’s like in his guarded and unguarded moments and… he is in no way anti-Jewish” – Deputy Mayor Nicky Gavron. – But of course.
I can’t find anything on the outcome of the Livingstone ‘probe’. Hummm. Fancy that.
@ lwtc
lol.
@ Crown
The vast majority of Jewish holocaust victims wouldn’t have been Zionists because most European Jews weren’t at that time, it was an unpopular ideology. Zionist shared a lot of the Nazis racial beliefs and were equally committed to the view that Jews should be forcibly deported from Europe and shouldn’t live among other Europeans. Zionist showed as much disdain for European Jewry, as the Nazis. Jewish holocaust victims were murdered because of two evil ideologies: Nazism and Zionism.
Iwtc247,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4286633.stm
Iwtc247, when Ken was gagged,he angrily said to one of the journalists the he was acting like a gate keeper at concentration camp ,to which Evening Standard man replied, did you know I am a jew?
crown…
Please don’t use the term ‘jews’ in that ambiguous sence. There are fine Jews, Jews I’d be happy to call brother. I take it to mean you mean ‘pretend Jews’ akin to Zionists who cloak themselves in a delible layer of something resembling Judaism
crown…
“Remember what Ken Livingston told one journnalist?” – please tell
Careful Steph, Foxman and Dershowitz’ll be turning their evil eyes towards you.
#24.
Above comments makes it my suspicions stronger about holocoust,which was a co-opretated plan by jews.Remember what Ken Livingston told one journnalist?
PS:Steph,your article is eye opening and I am afraid you will be given many titles by those who simply deny the facts.
@ lwtc
150,000 men classified as Jewish or half Jewish served in the German military under Hitler, that’s nearly three times the number that fled to Palestine by September 1939 and more than the number of German Jews killed in the concentration camps. The only party other than the Nazis permitted in Germany under Hitler was the German Zionist party.
Zionism and Nazism were heavily intertwined and Zionist were as invovled as the Nazis in the holocaust but that’s hardly surprising, Zionist had no real support amongst mainstream European Jewry before the war.
@ Josephson.
Poor innocent Israel and its mini-me apologists getting exposed again. As for the holocaust, Its quite clear YOUR glad it happened. Provided a good training for you didn’t it.
Butchery and death delivered by good people like General Helmut Wilberg and Colonel Walter H. Hollaender.
Now let me see…. I wonder what quazi-religious political philosophy they subscribed to – not that your local Holocaust Industry outlet would ever have let you know.
Whats wrong Josephson? Been a while since you’ve killed a Palestinian is it?
Thanks Ric
I would have saved you some cybercake but Rob doesn’t do cake and he’s not really a Maserati man. He’s drives another Italian make, which is much more suited to his personality, I think.
@ Daniel
You’re talking complete and utter nonsense, the number of Palestinian born Jews is only marginally more than the number of Jews resident in Palestine and significantly less with Jews with an entitlement to Israeli citizenship. The idea that there is an Israeli culture is patently ridiculous, given that the vast majority of Jews to have Israeli citizenship are immigrants, and have no connection whatsoever to Palestine and most have no birth connection to the continent. Zionist have less claim to Palestine than the Germans had to Poland in 1939.
No European or American Jew can be indigenous to Palestine, if they weren’t born there or descended from those who were. Not a hard concept to understand.
“The meaning of indigenous population is obvious: native by birth or parentage, as opposed to an immigrant or colonial population”
The Isrealis are several generations deep and more firmly entrenched as a people and culture in Palestine than Britain was in India, Italy in Eritrea or France in North Africa. Does that not qualify them as an indigenous population?
@ Daniel
What is happening in Occupied Palestine is a genocidal colonial occupation.
Of course genocidal colonial occupation have happened before but it doesn’t make them morally right or inevitable.
I’m curious about your definition of “indigenous” peoples, the people’s who you believe have the moral right to the land they possess.
[mod edit: The meaning of indigenous population is obvious: native by birth or parentage, as opposed to an immigrant or colonial population.]
It seems to me that all that is happening in Israel is the same thing that always happens. What would the difference be?
Thank you for your response.
Amie
True, very true.
“Tiocfaidh ár lá”
Palestine and Ireland both!
Heather
Exactly, those people who support Israel, may as well support what the Nazis for al the moral difference. The genocide or ethnic cleansing of an indigenous people in the name of colonialism is morally repugnant and so are those who support it.
Dr M
That’s a good point. I’ve just been reading your articles on the “new” atheists, really well made points. I agree that Zionism is the most aggressive and nihilistic manifestation of a racist ideology in the world today, and secular Zionism has even less moral justification than religious Zionism – they are nothing more than Jewish Nazis.
Antifascism. What’s your agenda?
Anybody who don’t blame the Zionists for the occupation, ethnic cleansing and genocide of Palestine is pretty freaking stupid. They did it, who else you going to blame – the Palestinian people just for being there?
Tiocfaidh ár lá – Free Palestine!
PS – I’ve got a fantastic video on the banking system on my blog, check it out.
Super post, Steph. Interesting that the “new” atheists never touch Zionism, perhaps because at its root, its an atheist ideology born and bred in Europe? The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Yes, welcome back! Nervy, leaving us without a card or letter, holding our collective breath. Sheesh! Bet you didn’t save us any cybercake either.
And Happy Birthday to Maserati Man! I would’ve sent a hubcap or wheelnut, but finances are tight, you know?
Happy Birthday Rob XXXXXX
I sent you an email.
Well said. Genocide is genocide, no? It doesn’t make it right because it was done to the Jews too.
“Colonised” is the correct spelling.
Perhaps you think your misogynist imbecilic insults are a substitute for a coherent argument: they’re not, and they don’t change the fact that Israel is a JudeoNazi colony in Palestine or that Jewish terrorist have perpetrated acts of genocide and ethnic-cleansing against the Palestinian people and other Arabs for well over sixty years.
Nazi Germany had it’s supporters just like Israel does, because there are always xenophobic bigots and hatemongers willing to support genocide. Just don’t pretend there is moral difference between the two.
You spelled “colonised” incorrectly. COLONIZED
You are indeed a very angry women. You must need to get laid.
Thanks Ric
Hi Heather
Sorry about that, it was Rob’s birthday this week, normal service shall resume next week
Yeah, Jewish terrorists did, their last bombing in London was the Israeli embassy in the 90s… according to MI6. I wouldn’t mind if they were blowing it up for a decent reason – the Palestinians, Iraqis, Afghans and Iranians have a genuine reason to blow up the Houses of Parliament – they didn’t, they did it, even though Britain was supporting their genocidal vision of a Jewish Naziesque State.
@ Josephson
Yes, lets be honest: I don’t blame Israel – Israel is just the name that Jewish terrorists use for occupied Palestine – I blame the Jewish terrorist regime that occupies Palestine and is the sole cause for the Palestinian problem. If they hadn’t occupied and colonised Palestine or perpetrated a holocaust against the Palestinian people, there wouldn’t be a Palestinian problem and America wouldn’t be perpetrating a genocide against the Iraqi people and threatening to wage one against the Iranian people. In short the world would be better and safer place without JudeoNazism.
I don’t deny either holocaust the one perpetrated by the Nazis in Europe or the one still being perpetrated by the Jews in the Middle East. I think both are morally abhorrent and oppose the present one – whereas you support it!
If you could read, you’d know I’m neither a Marxist nor Maoist.
Steph, you live with so much anger – such a shame. Then again, I’d probably be angry too if I was a certified Marxist/ Maoist pinhead like you.
Don’t worry, be happy. And if you can’t be happy – blame Israel. And if you can’t blame Israel – blame ZOG.
Come on Steph, be honest – what’s your real agenda here? Are you one of those people that believes the holocaust never happened but wishes it would happen again?
I was getting withdrawal symptoms
Great post. Jewish terrorist tried to blow up the house of commons and assassinate the government?
The Jewish lobby has got a real bad memory when it comes to terrorism.
Nicely summed.